Nurse’s role in processing materials for robotic surgery: experience report

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5327/Z1414-44251055%20

Keywords:

Nurses, Robotics, Sterilization, Surgical instruments, Materials management, hospital

Abstract

Objective: To report the experience of nurses in the processing of materials for robotic surgery in two Sterile Processing Departments (SPD), comparing the processes. Methods: Experience report based on the practices of two nurses working with robotic surgery material processing in two Class II SPDs located in southern Brazil. Results: Similar processing steps were identified, including pre-preparation, reception and inspection, pre-cleaning, manual cleaning and rinsing, automated cleaning, drying, final inspection and lubrication, packaging, sterilization, and storage. Steps performed in Institution A but not in B included filling and immersion, as well as adenosine triphosphate (ATP) testing. Conclusion: Sharing knowledge and promoting best practices in material processing is essential, given the importance of controlling healthcare-associated infections, particularly surgical site infections, which are among the main postoperative complications.

References

Santos ML, Novaes CO, Iglesias AC. Epidemiological profile of patients seen in the pre-anesthetic assessment clinic of a university hospital. Braz J Anesthesiol. 2017;67(5):457-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjane.2017.04.006

Weiser TG, Haynes AB, Molina G, Lipsitz SR, Esquivel MM, Uribe-Leitz T, et al. Estimate of the global volume of surgery in 2012: an assessment supporting improved health outcomes. Lancet. 2015;385 Suppl 2;S11. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60806-6

Morrell ALG, Morrell-Junior AC, Morrell AG, Mendes JMF, Tustumi F, De-Oliveira-E-Silva LG, et al. The history of robotic surgery and its evolution: when illusion becomes reality. Rev Col Bras Cir. 2021;48:e20202798. https://doi.org/10.1590/0100-6991e-20202798

Nacul MP. Laparoscopy & robotics: a historical parallel. Rev Col Bras Cir. 2020;47:e20202811. https://doi.org/10.1590/0100-6991e-20202811

Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária. Resolução – RDC no 15, de 15 de março de 2012. Dispõe sobre requisitos de boas práticas para o processamento de produtos para saúde e dá outras providências [Internet]. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde; 2012 [acessado em 15 Out. 2023]. Disponível em: http://bvsms.saude.gov.br/bvs/saudelegis/anvisa/2012/rdc0015_15_03_2012.html

Associação Brasileira de Enfermeiros de Centro Cirúrgico, Recuperação Anestésica e Centro de Material e Esterilização. Diretrizes de práticas em enfermagem cirúrgica e processamento de produtos para a saúde. 8a edição. Barueri: SOBECC; 2021.

Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária. Informe Técnico no 01/09. Princípios básicos para limpeza de instrumental cirúrgico em serviços de saúde [Internet]. 2009 [acessado em 15 Out. 2023] Disponível em: https://www.saude.sp.gov.br/resources/cve-centro-de-vigilancia-epidemiologica/areas-de-vigilancia/infeccao-hospitalar/doc/if_anvisa_limpeza.pdf

Lipscomb IP, Sihota AK, Keevil CW. Comparative study of surgical instruments from sterile-service departments for presence of residual gram-negative endotoxin and proteinaceous deposits. J Clin Microbiol. 2006;44(10):3728-33. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.01280-06

Intuitive Surgical. Instruções de reprocessamento de instrumentos da Vinci Xi (EndoWrist, Single-Site e Grampeador) [Internet]. Intuitive Surgical Inc; 2023 [acessado em 23 Nov. 2023]. Disponível em: https://manuals.intuitivesurgical.com/c/document_library/get_file?uuid=7a94321b-4e89-7bfe-69bc-5a9a611cd8af&groupId=73750789

Alvim AL, Ramos MS, Durão PMS. Monitoramento da limpeza de produtos para a saúde com teste adenosina trifosfato. Rev SOBECC. 2019;24(2):57-61. https://doi.org/10.5327/Z1414-4425201900020002

Published

2025-11-12

How to Cite

Rodrigues, S. V., Reis, F. U. C. dos, Conzatti, P., Souza, D. W. de, & Caregnato, R. C. A. (2025). Nurse’s role in processing materials for robotic surgery: experience report. Revista SOBECC, 30. https://doi.org/10.5327/Z1414-44251055

Issue

Section

CASE REPORT