(Dis)conformity of the working process in the material and sterilization center
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5327/Z1414-4425202000010002Keywords:
Enfermagem, Centro de material e esterilização, ProcessosAbstract
Objectives: To evaluate the nursing work process in a Material and Sterilization Center (MSC) of a teaching hospital in Northeastern Brazil and to calculate the compliance rates of the work processes of hospital health products (HP) in the CME. Method: Observational study, with quantitative analyses. The target population consisted of nursing technicians and assistants, through systematic observation in the development of work processes. The sample resulted in 24 professionals, corresponding to 80% of the population. Results: Of the observed processes, the compliance rate was lower (29.17%) in sterilization and higher (56.94%) in the storage/distribution of the products. As for subprocesses, it was higher (90.28%) in sealing and lower (8.33%) in rinsing the HP. Conclusion: The average process compliance showed an index below the limit of 70%, compromising most of the nursing team’s work process.References
Ascari RA, Vidori J, Moretti CA, Perin EMF, Silva OM, Buss E. O processo de esterilização de materiais em serviços de saúde: uma revisão integrativa. Braz. J. Surg. Clin. Res. 2013; 4(2): 33-8.
Diretrizes de Práticas em Enfermagem Cirúrgica e Processamento de Produtos para a Saúde. Associação de Enfermeiros de Centro Cirúrgico, Recuperação Anestésica e Centro de Material e Esterilização - SOBECC. São Paulo: 7ª Ed. Manole, p. 7-180. 2017.
Brasil, ANVISA, Resolução – RDC nº 15, de 15 de março de 2012. Dispõe sobre requisitos de boas práticas para o processamento de produtos para saúde e dá outras providências. [Internet]. 2012 .Acesso 2017 Ago 10. Disponível em: http://www.anvisa.gov.br
Donabedian A. The Quality of Care. JAMA. [Internet]. 1998 [Cited 2017 dez 20]; 260 (12): 1743-48. Avaliable: http://jama.jamanetwork.com/ by a University of South Carolina
Graziano KU et al. Indicadores de avaliação do processamento de artigos odonto-médico-hospitalares: elaboração e validação. Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da Universidade de São Paulo. [Internet]. 2009 [Acesso 2016 mai 16]; 43(2): 1174-80. Disponível em: http://www.scielo.br/pdf/reeusp/v43nspe2/a05v43s2.pdf
Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation- AAMI. America National. Standard. Comprehensive guide to steam sterilization and sterility assurance in health care facilities. Advancing Safety in Medical Technology A4. Arlington: AAMI, 177p. 2013
Provincial Infectious Diseases Advisory Committee- PIDAC. Best practices for cleaning, disinfection and sterilization of medical equipment/devices. 3rd ed. Toronto, ON: Queen’s Printer for Ontario; [Internet]. 2013 [Cited 2017 dez 17]. Avaliable: https://www.publichealthontario.ca/en/BrowseByTopic/InfectiousDiseases/PIDAC/Pages/Cleaning_Disinfection_Sterilization.aspx
Morton PJ, Conner R. Implementing AORN Recommended Practices for Selection and Use of Packaging Systems for Sterilization. AORN Journal. [Internet]. 2014 [Cited 2017 set 17]; 99(4): 495-505. Avaliable: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24674795
Padilha EF, Matsuda LM. Qualidade dos cuidados de enfermagem em terapia intensiva: avaliação por meio de auditoria operacional. Rev Bras Enferm, Brasilia 2011; 64(4): 684-91.
Conselho Federal de Enfermagem- COFEN-. Pesquisa perfil da enfermagem no Brasil. Rio de Janeiro. [Internet] 2013 [Acesso 2018 abr 21]. Disponível em: http://www.cofen.gov.br/perfilenfermagem
Costa CCP, Souza NVDO, Pires AS. Perfil dos trabalhadores de uma central de material e esterilização: uma análise das características sócio profissionais. J. res.: fundam. care. online. [Internet] 2016 [Acesso 2018 jan 17]; 8(1):3633-45. Disponível em: http://www.seer.unirio.br/index.php/cuidadofundamental/article/view/3667/pdf_1768
Roseira CE, Silva DM, Passos IPBD, Orlandi FS, Padoveze MC et al. Diagnosis of compliance of health care product processing in Primary Health Care. Rev. Latino-Am. Enfermagem [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2018 Jan 30]; 24: e2820. Available from: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-11692016000100426&lng=en
Costa EAM, Dórea EO, Alves MA, Nery F, Schettini H, Belmonte M et al. Reprocessamento de produtos para saúde: análise da qualidade sanitária em hospitais públicos. Rev. SOBECC, São Paulo. 2015; 20(1): 17-23.
Madeira MZA, Santos AMR, Batista OMA, Rodrigues FTC. Processamento de produtos para saúde em centro de material e esterilização. Rev. SOBECC, São Paulo. 2015; 20(4): 220-27.
Petersen BT, Cohen CJ, Hambrick R, Buttar N, Greenwald DA, Buscaglia JM et al. Multisociety guideline on reprocessing flexible GI endoscopes: 2016 update. Gastrointest Endosc. [Internet]. 2017 [Cited 2017 set 11]; 85(2): 282-94 el. Avaliable: http://www.giejournal.org/article/S0016-5107(16)30647-2/fulltext
Norma Regulamentadora 6 – NR 6. Equipamento de proteção individua-lEPI. Manual de legislação Atlas - Segurança e Medicina do Trabalho. 71ª ed. São Paulo: Atlas, 2013.
Freire EMR, Martinez MR. Situational diagnosis: an aid tool in quality management. J Nurs UFPE on line. Recife-PE, 2014; 8(5):1405-12.
Espindola MCG, Fontana RT. Riscos ocupacionais e mecanismos de autocuidado do trabalhador de um centro de material e esterilização. Rev Gaúcha Enferm. Porto Alegre- RS, 2012; 33(1): 116-23.
Brasil, DATASUS- Tecnologia da Informação a Serviço do SUS, online, [Internet]. Brasília, 2010 [Acesso 2018 abr 21]. Disponível em: http://tabnet.datasus.gov.br/cgi/tabcgi.exe?ibge/censo/cnv/escbRS.def
Cowperthwaite L, Holm RL. Guideline implementation: surgical instrument cleaning. AORN Journal. [Internet]. 2015 [Cite 2017 dez 17]; 101(5): 342-552. Disponível em: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25946180
Turco M, Chalaye C, Poulard E, Gocko C, Neyron C, Courbon G. et al. Évaluation de l’impact d’une formation pluridisciplinaire sur le bon usage des gants à l’hôpital Médecine et Maladies Infectieuses. [Internet]. 2014 [Cited 2018 fev 20]; 44 (6): 68-74. Avaliable: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medmal.2014.04.001
Mansur JM. Reuse of Single-Use Devices: Understanding Risks and Strategies for Decision-Making for Health Care Organizations. Joint Commission International. [Internet]. 2017 [Cited 2017 out 12]; p. 1-12. Avaliable: https://www.jointcommissioninternational.org/news/reuse-of-single-use-devices
McDonnell G, Dehen C, Perrin A,Thomas V, Igel-Egalon A, Burke PA et al. Cleaning, disinfection and sterilization of surface prion contamination. Journal of Hospital Infection. [Internet]. 2013 [Cited 2018 fev 02]; 85: 268-73. Avaliable: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24074640
Schwaab G, Jacoby AM, Lunkes JT, Ascari RA, Lautert L. Esterilização de produtos para saúde em serviços públicos. Recife. Rev enferm UFPE on line. [Internet]. 2016. [Acesso 02 ago 2017]; 10(12):4591-8. Disponível em: 10.5205/reuol.9978-88449-6-ED1012201621
Araujo GM, Reisdorfer N, Silva LA, Soder RM, Santos AM. Segurança do paciente: embalagens, acondicionamento e tempo de guarda de materiais esterilizados na atenção básica. Cienc Cuid Saude, 2016; 15(4):662-68.
Tomé MF, Lima AFC. Mapeamento do processo de reprocessamento de campos cirúrgicos de tecido de algodão. Rev. SOBECC, São Paulo. 2015; 20(4): 197-201.
Mendonça ACC, Bezerra ALQ, Tipple AFV, Tobias, GC. Indicadores de qualidade de processamento de produtos para a saúde em autoclaves a vapor. Rev enferm UFPE on line, Recife. [Internet]. 2017 [Acesso 2018 mar 20]: 11(Supl.2):906-14. Disponível em: https://periodicos.ufpe.br/revistas/revistaenfermagem/article/viewFile/13459/16148
Jabbari H. Developing the Use of Quality Indicators in Sterilization Practices. Iran J Public Health. [Internet]. 2012 [Cited 2018 mar 20]; 41(7): 64-69. Avaliable: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3469009/
Rutala WA, Weber DJ. Monitoring and improving the effectiveness of surface cleaning and disinfection. American Journal of Infection Control. [Internet]. 2016 [Cited 2018 jan 20]; 44 (5 Suppl): e69-e76. 2016. Avaliable: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27131138
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
By publishing in Revista SOBECC, authors retain the copyright of their article and agree to license their work using a Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) International Public License, thus accepting the terms of this license. The CC BY 4.0 license allows others to distribute, remix, adapt, and create from the published article, even for commercial purposes, provided they give due credit to the creators of the work (authors of the article).
The authors grant to Revista SOBECC the right of first publication, to identify itself as the original publisher, and grant to the journal a non-exclusive license to use the work in the following ways: (1) to sell and/or distribute the article in hard copies and/or in electronic format; (2) to distribute parts and/or the entire article in order to promote the journal through the internet and other digital and printed media; (3) to record and reproduce the article in any format, including digital media.
With this license, authors can enter into separate contracts for non-exclusive distribution of the article (e.g., publishing in an institutional repository or as a book chapter), with acknowledgement of authorship and initial publication in Revista SOBECC. Authors are encouraged to publish and distribute their work online after publication in the Revista SOBECC, as this can increase the article's visibility and impact.
In line with the journal's policies, each published article will be assigned a CC BY 4.0 license, which will be visible on the abstract page and in the PDF of each article with the respective link to the license terms.