A systematic approach for the rationalization of surgical tray instruments
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5327/Z1414-4425201800010009Keywords:
Enfermagem, Centro de material e esterilizaçãoAbstract
Objective: To report the experience of developing a systematic approach for the rationalization of instruments in surgical trays. Method: Study
of the development of a systematic approach for the rationalization of instruments, carried out in 2015, using a qualitative method, in the Central Sterile
Supply Department (CSSD) of a federal university hospital in Porto Alegre, Brazil. Results: There was a 10.92% average reduction in the number of instruments
in institutional trays, a reduction in the number of trays owned by medical teams — 84.06% belonged to the otorhinolaryngology team — and
a definitive inactivation of 369 orthopedic surgery instruments, which represented 72.84% of the total number of inactivated instruments. In addition,
improvements were made to the management of instruments, the optimization of preparation time and the reduction of sterilization by expiration date.
Conclusion: The relocation of instruments and the addition of items in specific trays allowed for the reappraisal of requests for purchase of instruments
and the improvement of relationships between the teams. This systematic approach contributed significantly to the management of instruments, the
optimizing processes and the involvement of the surgical teams in the work of the CSSD, thus demonstrating that it can be applied in other institutions.
References
Graziano KU, Lacerda RA, Turrini RTN, Calicchio LG. Indicadores de
qualidade do centro de material e esterilização. In: Graziano KU,
Silva A, Pasltikidis EM, eds. Enfermagem em centro de material e
esterilização. Barueri: Manole; 2011. p. 284-300. Capítulo 13.
Possari JF. Centro cirúrgico: planejamento, organização e gestão.
a ed. São Paulo: Iátria; 2010.
Associação Paulista de Epidemiologia e Controle de Infecção
Relacionada à Assistência à Saúde (APECIH). Limpeza, desinfecção
e esterilização de artigos em serviços de saúde. São Paulo:
APECIH; 2010.
Brasil. Ministério da Saúde (MS). Agencia Nacional de Vigilância
Sanitária (ANVISA). Resolução de Diretoria Colegiada RDC n. 15, de
de março de 2012. Dispõe sobre requisitos de boas práticas para
o processamento de produtos para saúde e dá outras providências.
Brasília (DF): Ministério da Saúde; 2012.
Bronzatti JAG, Turrini RNTT, Moriya GAA . Controle de instrumental no
centro de material e esterilização. In: Graziano KU, Silva A, Psaltikidis
EM, eds. Enfermagem em centro de material e esterilização. São
Paulo: Manole; 2011. p. 263-84.
Associação Brasileira de Enfermeiros de Centro Cirúrgico, Recuperação
Anestésica e Centro de Material e Esterilização (SOBECC). Diretrizes
de práticas em enfermagem cirúrgica e processamento de produtos
para a saúde. 7a ed. Baruei: Manole; São Paulo: SOBECC; 2017.
Farrokhi RF, Gunther M, Williams B, Blackmore CC. Application of
lean methodology for improved quality and efficiency in operating
room instrument availability. J Healthc Qual. 2015;37(5):277-86.
DOI: 10.1111/jhq.12053
Greenberg JA, Wylie B, Robinson JN. A pilot study to assess the
adequacy of the Brigham 20 Kit for cesarean delivery. Int J Gynaecol
Obstet. 2012;117(2):157-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2011.12.007
Reymondon F, Pellet B, Marcon E. Optimization of hospital sterilization
costs proposing new grouping choices of medical devices into
packages. Int J Prod Econ. 2008;112(1):326-35.
Cardoen B, Beliën J, Vanhoucke M. On the design of custom packs:
grouping of medical disposable items for surgeries. Int J Prod Res.
;53(24):7343-59. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2015.1061221
Agard B, Penz B. A simulated annealing method based on a clustering
approach to determine bills of materials for a large product family. Int
J Prod Econ. 2009;117(2):389-401. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2008.12.004
Dobson G, Froix A, Seidmann A, Tilson V, Froix A. Configuring
surgical instrument trays to reduce costs. IISE Trans Health Syst Eng.
;5(4):225-37. https://doi.org/10.1080/19488300.2015.1094759
Keptner KM. Mixed methods design: a beginner’s guide. The Qualitative
Report. 2011;16(2):593-95.
Ressel LB, Beck CLC, Gualda DMR, Hoffmann IC, Silva RMD, Sehnem GD.
O uso do grupo focal em pesquisa qualitativa. Texto & Contexto Enferm.
;17(4):779-86. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0104-07072008000400021
Barbour R. Grupos Focais. Porto Alegre: Artmed; 2009. 216p.
Fogliatto FS, Anzanello MJ, Tortorella GL, Schneider DS, Pereira
CG, Schaan BD. A Six Sigma approach to analyze time-to-assembly
variance of surgical trays in a sterile services department. J Healthc
Qual. 2017 Mar 24. DOI: 10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000078
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
By publishing in Revista SOBECC, authors retain the copyright of their article and agree to license their work using a Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) International Public License, thus accepting the terms of this license. The CC BY 4.0 license allows others to distribute, remix, adapt, and create from the published article, even for commercial purposes, provided they give due credit to the creators of the work (authors of the article).
The authors grant to Revista SOBECC the right of first publication, to identify itself as the original publisher, and grant to the journal a non-exclusive license to use the work in the following ways: (1) to sell and/or distribute the article in hard copies and/or in electronic format; (2) to distribute parts and/or the entire article in order to promote the journal through the internet and other digital and printed media; (3) to record and reproduce the article in any format, including digital media.
With this license, authors can enter into separate contracts for non-exclusive distribution of the article (e.g., publishing in an institutional repository or as a book chapter), with acknowledgement of authorship and initial publication in Revista SOBECC. Authors are encouraged to publish and distribute their work online after publication in the Revista SOBECC, as this can increase the article's visibility and impact.
In line with the journal's policies, each published article will be assigned a CC BY 4.0 license, which will be visible on the abstract page and in the PDF of each article with the respective link to the license terms.