Influence of surgical instrument identifiers on microbial contamination of scalpel handles after cleaning and sterilization
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5327/Z1414-4425202429939%20Keywords:
Dental instruments, Sterilization, MicrobiologyAbstract
Objective: To evaluate the influence of different instrument identifiers on the microbial growth of critical devices after cleaning and sterilization steps. Method: Fifteen No. 3 scalpel handles were used as test specimens, divided into 3 groups (n=5), with each group consisting of an instrument without an identifier and four other instruments with the following identifiers: laser engraving, silicone ring, vinyl identifier with permanent adhesive and personalized adhesive label. After being submerged in the surgical aspirate, the instruments were processed in accordance with the good practice requirements of Resolution No. 15/2012 from the National Health Surveillance Agency (Anvisa). Microbial growth was evaluated at different times qualitatively, by the presence or absence of growth, and quantitatively for positive cases, by counting viable colony-forming units (log CFU/scalpel handle). Results: At some point, there was microbial growth on the instruments regardless of the type of identifier. However, there was no continuous and progressive contamination after repeating the cleaning and sterilization steps. Conclusion: The type of dental instrument identifier does not interfere with microbial growth as long as cleaning and sterilization standards are respected.
References
Kohn WG, Collins AS, Cleveland JL, Harte JA, Eklund KJ, Malvitz, DM, et al. Guidelines for infection control in dental health care settings--2003. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2003;52(RR-17):1-61. PMID: 14685139.
Elzein R, Bader B, Rammal A, Husseini H, Jassar H, Al-Haidary M, et al. Legal liability facing COVID-19 in dentistry: Between malpractice and preventive recommendations. J Forensic Leg Med. 2021;78:102123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jflm.2021.102123
Smith G, Smith A. Microbial contamination of used dental handpieces. Am J Infect Control. 2014;42(9):1019-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2014.06.008
Spaulding EH, Emmons EK. Chemical disinfection. Am J Nurs. 1958;58(9):1238-42. https://doi.org/10.2307/3472880
Zamora MS. Guía para el manejo del autoclave en la central de esterilización del Hospital Universitario de Ceuta [Internet]. Madrid: Instituto Nacional de Gestión Sanitaria; 2013 [accessed on Jul 22, 2023]. Available at: https://elautoclave.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/autoclave.pdf
Winter S, Smith A, Lappin D, McDonagh G, Kirk B. Investigating steam penetration using thermometric methods in dental handpieces with narrow internal lumens during sterilizing processes with non-vacuum or vacuum processes. J Hosp Infect. 2017;97(4):338-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2017.07.033
Böhler L, Daniol M, Wehrle C. Identification of instruments and implants with RFID and Data Matrix codes for the use at the instrument table. Przeglad Elektrotechniczny. 2016;1(11):227-30. https://doi.org/10.15199/48.2016.11.54
Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária. Resolução da Diretoria Colegiada – RDC no 15 de 15/03/2012. Dispõe sobre requisitos de boas práticas para o processamento de produtos para saúde e dá outras providências [Internet]. 2012 [accessed on Mar 27, 2024]. Available at: https://antigo.anvisa.gov.br/legislacao#/visualizar/28845
Cottone JA, Molinari JA. State-of-the-art infection control in dentistry. J Am Dent Assoc. 1991;122(8):33-41. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1991.0254
Edwardsson S, Svensäter G, Birkhed D. Steam sterilization of air turbine dental handpieces. Acta Odontol Scand. 1983;41(6):321-6. https://doi.org/10.3109/00016358309162342
Andersen HK, Fiehn NE, Larsen T. Effect of steam sterilization inside the turbine chambers of dental turbines. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1999;87(2):184-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1079-2104(99)70271-4
Smith A, Letters S, Lange A, Perrett D, McHugh S, Bagg J. Residual protein levels on reprocessed dental instruments. J Hosp Infect. 2005;61(3):237-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2005.01.021
Murdoch H, Taylor D, Dickinson J, Walker JT, Perrett D, Raven ND, et al. Surface decontamination of surgical instruments: an ongoing dilemma. J Hosp Infect. 2006;63(4):432-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2006.02.015
Bortolato DL, Martelli A, Acoria N, Martinez E, Gamarra J. El encintado como método de control del instrumental quirúrgico. Med Infant. 2008;15(3):240-2.
Samit A, Dodson R. Instrument-marking tapes: an unnecessary hazard. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1983;41(10):687-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-2391(83)90029-0
Kraayenbrink M, Baer ST, Jenkins JG, Moore-Gillon V. Serious hazard of plastic coding tape on surgical instruments. Br J Surg. 1987;74(8):696. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.1800740815
McKenzie JA, Greenberg CC, White CQ. Preventing unintended retained foreign objects: putting policy into practice. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2021;47(9):543-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcjq.2021.07.002
Bruna CQM, Almeida AGCS, Graziano KU. Assessment of microbial contamination in surgical instrument identication tapes and resins. RevSobecc. 2019;24(1):12-6. https://doi.org/10.5327/Z1414-4425201900010004
Pereira LB, Oliveira MAVC, Biffi JCG. Evaluation of the effectiveness of cleaning endodontic files methods. Biosci J. 2013;29(4):1058-63.
Neves ZCP, Melo DS, Souza ACS, Tipple AFV, Rodriguez MAV. Items sterilized in humid heat: validation of the storage system. Rev Bras Enferm. 2004;57(2):152-6. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0034-71672004000200004
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Laura Bellini de Souza, Renan Pereira Barbosa, Mariana Simões de Oliveira, Marcelle Silva Alves de Paula, Ana Carolina Morais Apolônio, Matheus Furtado de Carvalho
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
By publishing in Revista SOBECC, authors retain the copyright of their article and agree to license their work using a Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) International Public License, thus accepting the terms of this license. The CC BY 4.0 license allows others to distribute, remix, adapt, and create from the published article, even for commercial purposes, provided they give due credit to the creators of the work (authors of the article).
The authors grant to Revista SOBECC the right of first publication, to identify itself as the original publisher, and grant to the journal a non-exclusive license to use the work in the following ways: (1) to sell and/or distribute the article in hard copies and/or in electronic format; (2) to distribute parts and/or the entire article in order to promote the journal through the internet and other digital and printed media; (3) to record and reproduce the article in any format, including digital media.
With this license, authors can enter into separate contracts for non-exclusive distribution of the article (e.g., publishing in an institutional repository or as a book chapter), with acknowledgement of authorship and initial publication in Revista SOBECC. Authors are encouraged to publish and distribute their work online after publication in the Revista SOBECC, as this can increase the article's visibility and impact.
In line with the journal's policies, each published article will be assigned a CC BY 4.0 license, which will be visible on the abstract page and in the PDF of each article with the respective link to the license terms.